Chemical Structure of DNA
Varsha Butola1*, Revathi B2, Anila G3 and Sravan Kumar P4
1Department of Biotechnology, Graphic Era University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India
2Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Osmania University, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
3Department of Pharmacy, JNTU, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
4Department of Chemistry, Osmania University, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
- *Corresponding Author:
- Varsha B
Department of Biotechnology
Graphic Era University, Dehradun
Uttarakhand, India
E-mail: butolavarsha123@gmail.com
Received date: 26/06/2016; Accepted date: 30/06/2016; Published date: 25/07/2016
Visit for more related articles at Research & Reviews: Journal of Chemistry
Abstract
DNA (Deoxyribonucleic acid) is also known as the basic unit of nucleus which is present inside the cell. DNA is a molecule which makes each and every individual unique. It contains the information that how an organism needs to develop, live and reproduce. DNA is the medium by which genetic material is passed down from parents to their offspring so basically DNA is the hereditary material in almost all the organisms. Every cell in our body has the same DNA. Deoxyribonucleic acid as the name suggests its structure it is made up of deoxyribose sugar. DNA molecule is consisting of two polynucleotide chains contains four different types of nucleotide subunit these chains of DNA is known as DNA strands. Between the nucleotide hydrogen bond holds the structure in each type of nucleotide subunit only base differs from each other.
Keywords
DNA replication, DNA Transcription, DNA Translation, Nucleiotides
Introduction
The structure of DNA [1-4] was first discovered by James Watson and Francis Crick in 1953. They determine that DNA is a double helix structure the two DNA strands [5,6] are spirally attached to each other and on the base of the nucleotide hydrogen bond [7] is the bond which holds the structure of the DNA. In the DNA nucleotides contains the deoxyribose sugar attached with a phosphate group [8-11] and one of the bases. DNA is called hereditary material because DNA is much more stable then RNA. DNA is semiconservative [12-14] in nature.
Structure of Nucleotide
Nitrogenous Bases: Adenine, Guanine, Thymine, Cytosine.
Deoxyribose Sugar [15,16] (absence of the oxygen at the second carbon).
Phosphate Group.
Nucleotides are joined with each other by covalent bonds which form in between the sugar of the first nucleotide and the phosphate of the next nucleotide and the whole formation is known as sugar phosphate backbone. The polynucleotides are bound together by the double stranded hydrogen bond the two strands of DNA are anti-parallel they run in opposite directions to each other. During cell division [17,18], the two strands of DNA split into two single strands and then the two single strands used as a template [19-22] In order to form a new complimentary strand which will repeat the same process during cell division [23,24].
Bond formation between nitrogenous bases:
Nitrogenous bases [25,26] are of two types: Purines: Adenine, Guanine.
Pyrimidine: Cytosine, Thymine, Uracil.
Purine shares double hydrogen bond [27] whereas pyrimidine shares triple hydrogen bond.
Erwin Chargaff’s Rule: Chargaff explained that A=T and C=G, means the amount of the adenine is equals to thymine and the amount of cytosine is same as the amount of the guanine.
Watson and Crick Model of DNA: Watson and Crick got Nobel Prize for the discovery of the structure of the DNA the main feature that he described about DNA are:
• DNA molecule is made up of double stranded polynucleotide strands [28-30] which are spirally twist around each other it form right-handed coiled structure.
• Both the strands will be antiparallel [31,32] means they will run opposite to each other so that 3′ end of one chain will face the 5′ end of the other strand.
• Two strands will remain attached with the help of the hydrogen bond [33] between the two bases.
• Adenine and Thymine will pair with each other with double hydrogen bond, guanine and cytosine will pair with each other with triple hydrogen bond.
• DNA helix will have one minor groove and one major groove.
• Diameter of DNA is 20 A. the bases are separated by 0.34 nm. The complete turn length of the helix is 3.4 nm. 10 bp per turn will be there.
DNA Basics (Eukaryotes Vs Prokaryotes)
• Very small fraction of DNA is active in eukaryotes [34-38].
• Only a single loop of DNA is present in the nucleoid of prokaryotes [39].
• Prokaryotes DNA are much simpler then eukaryotic DNA.
• DNA is stored in the nucleus of the cell in eukaryotic cell.
• DNA present in the eukaryotes has the histone protein but in prokaryotes histone proteins [40-44] are absent.
• Eukaryotes DNA are tightly organized, whereas the prokaryotes DNA are single loop of chromosomal DNA.
Basic Terms
DNA Replication: DNA molecule will produce two identical DNA. DNA is semi conservative [45] in nature.
DNA Translation: Transformation of mRNA or cellular RNA to protein. Three main phases will be there in translation Initiation, Elongation and Termination [46,47].
DNA Transcription: Transformation of DNA to mrna. Rna polymerase is the enzyme which play key role in this process. It may include the processes like polyadenylation, capping, and splicing [48].
Conclusion
DNA is the basic genetic material for all the eukaryotes and prokaryotes. In eukaryotes it is much more complicated than in the eukaryotes. It is a double helix structure. The two strands of DNA is antiparallel to each other they will run in the opposite direction and also they are complementary to each other. DNA is semiconservative in nature which means during replication when the two DNA strand will replicate they will produce the new double stranded DNA with each the strand. DNA is called the basic hereditary unit because it is more stable then RNA because in RNA oxygen is present at the second carbon which makes it unstable.
References
- Salah S. A Novel Approach for Treatment Patients with Multiple Sclerosis by Using DNA Polymerase. J Alzheimers Dis Parkinsonism. 2016;6:235.
- Suppan M, et al. PCR-based Gene Synthesis, Cloning, Expression, Purification and Characterization of Bst DNA Polymerase in E. coli Cells. Curr Synthetic Sys Biol. 2015;3:126.
- Bukhvostov AA, et al. An Atypical DNA Polymerase Beta Overexpressed in Human Aml/Hl-60 Malignant Cells. J Cancer Sci Ther. 2013;5:94-99.
- Yadav R and Srivastava P. Visualization of High Throughput Genomic Data Using R and Bioconductor. J Data Mining Genomics Proteomics. 2016;7:197.
- Mishra S and Gomase VS. Computational Approach to Identify the Major Histocompatibility Complex Binding Antigenic Peptides from ‘Ascariasis’. J Data Mining Genomics Proteomics. 2016;7:198.
- Kheiavi EK, et al. Genome Mining of Rice (Oryza sativa ssp. indica) for Detection and Characterization of Long Palindromic Sequences. J Data Mining Genomics & Proteomics. 2016;7:199.
- Mittal P and Jain M. Proteomics:An Indispensable Tool for Novel Biomarker Identification in Melanoma. J Data Mining Genomics Proteomics. 2016;7:204.
- Narayan M, et al. Identification of Novel Cdc37 Interacting Proteins and Pathways in Human Alzheimer’s Disease Brain Tissue Using Mass Spectrometry. J Data Mining Genomics & Proteomics. 2016;7:193.
- Berezin AE. Impaired Immune Phenotype of Endothelial Cell-derived Micro Particles:The Missing Link between Diabetes-related States and Risk of Cardiovascular Complications?. J Data Mining Genomics & Proteomics. 2016;7:195.
- Tan Q, et al. Generalized Measure of Dependency for Analysis of Omics Data. J Data Mining Genomics Proteomics. 2015;6:183.
- Shouval R, et al. Interpretable Boosted Decision Trees for Prediction of Mortality Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. J Data Mining Genomics Proteomics. 2015;6:184.
- Huang DW, et al. Towards Better Precision Medicine:Pacbio Single-Molecule Long Reads Resolve the Interpretation of HIV Drug Resistant Mutation Profiles at Explicit Quasispecies (Haplotype) Level. J Data Mining Genomics Proteomics. 2015;6:182.
- Gutch RS, et al. Review Paper:Data Mining of Fungal Secondary Metabolites Using Genomics and Proteomics. J Data Mining Genomics Proteomics. 2015;6:178.
- Wu M, et al. Model-Free Inference for ChIP-Seq Data. J Data Mining Genomics Proteomics. 2014 ;5:153.
- Patel SS, et al. Homology Modelling of Conserved rbcL Amino Acid Sequences in Leguminosae Family. J Data Mining Genomics Proteomics. 2014;5:154.
- Vaghela VB, et al. Information Theory Based Feature Selection for Multi-Relational Naïve Bayesian Classifier. J Data Mining Genomics Proteomics. 2014;5:155.
- Sherkhane AS and Gomase VS. Evolutionary Distance and Conserved Domain Analysis of Divergent Phylogenetic Lineages from Genus Naja. J Data Mining Genomics Proteomics. 2014;5:156.
- Mehmood MA, et al. Use of Bioinformatics Tools in Different Spheres of Life Sciences. J Data Mining Genomics Proteomics. 2014;5:158.
- Lipsky EB, et al. Node-Oriented Workflow (NOW):A Command Template Workflow Management Tool for High Throughput Data Analysis Pipelines. J Data Mining Genomics Proteomics. 2014;5:159.
- Rojeab AY. A Commentary Article on:DNA Replication, Telomere Function and Cancer Action. J Bioengineer & Biomedical Sci. 2015;6:174.
- Dmitriev LF and Titov VN. DNA Replication and Telomere Shortening:Key Factors Related to the Production of C3-Aldehydes and the Interaction of One of them with DNA Guanine Residues. J Gerontol Geriat Res. 2014;3:175.
- Villela AD, et al. Human Interferon B1ser17:Coding DNA Synthesis, Expression, Purification and Characterization of Bioactive Recombinant Protein. J Microbial Biochem Technol. 2010;2:111-117.
- Barth T, et al. Assessment of rhEPO in Pharmaceutical Formulations by a Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatographic Method and Bioassay. J Liq Chromatogr Relat Technol. 2007;30:1277-1288
- Bermel RA and Rudick RA. Interferon-ß treatment for multiple sclerosis. Neurotherapeutics. 2007;4:633-646.
- Borden EC, et al. Interferons at age 50:past, current and future impact on biomedicine. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2007;6:975-990.
- Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72:248-254.
- Chassaigne H and Lobinski R. Characterization of horse kidney metallothionein isoforms by electrospray MS and reversed-phase HPLCelectrospray MS. Analyst. 1998;123:2125-2130.
- Covic A and Kuhlmann MK. Biosimilars:recent developments. Int Urol Nephrol. 2007;39:261-266.
- Dalmora SL, et al. Validation of an RP-LC Method and Assessment of rhG-CSF in Pharmaceutical Formulations by Liquid Chromatography and Biological Assay. J Liq Chromatogr Relat Technol. 2006;29:1753-1767.
- Gonenne A and Ernst R. Solubilization of membrane proteins by sulfobetaines, novel zwitterionic surfactants. Anal Biochem. 1978;87:28-38.
- Hirel PH, et al. Extent of N-terminal methionine excision from Escherichia coli proteins is governed by the side chain length of the penultimate amino acid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1989;86:8247-8251.
- Hjelmeland LM and Chrambach A. Solubilization of functional membrane proteins. Methods Enzymol. 1984;104:305-318.
- Javed A and Reder AT. Therapeutic role of beta-interferons in multiple sclerosis. Pharmacol Ther. 2006;110:35-56.
- Karpusas M, et al. The structure of human interferon-ß:implications for activity. Cell Mol Life Sci. 1998;54:1203-1216.
- Lin LS, et al. Purification of recombinant Human Interferon ß expressed in Escherichia coli. Methods Enzymol. 1986;119:183–192.
- Rader RA. (Re)defining biopharmaceutical. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26:743-751.
- Runkel L, et al. Structural and functional differences between glycosylated and nonglycosylated forms of human interferon-ß (IFN-ß). Pharm Res. 1998;15:641–649.
- MacDougall CA, et al. The structural determinants of checkpoint activation. Genes Dev. 2007;21:898-903.
- Gong Z, et al. BACH1/FANCJ acts with TopBP1 and participates early in DNA replication checkpoint control. Molecular cell. 2010;37:438-446.
- Zou L and Elledge SJ. Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes. Science. 300:2003;1542-1548.
- Unsal-Kacmaz K, et al. The human Tim/Tipin complex coordinates an Intra-S checkpoint response to UV that slows replication fork displacement. Mol Cell Biol. 2007;27:3131-3142.
- Chini CC and Chen J. Human claspin is required for replication checkpoint control. J BiolChem. 2003;278:30057-30062.
- Kumagai A and Dunphy WG. Claspin, a novel protein required for the activation of Chk1 during a DNA replication checkpoint response in Xenopus egg extracts. Mol Cell. 2000;6:839-849.
- Cho WH, et al. Human Tim-Tipin complex affects the biochemical properties of the replicative DNA helicase and DNA polymerases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:2523-2527.
- Unsal-Kacmaz K, et al. Coupling of human circadian and cell cycles by the timeless protein. Mol Biol Cell. 2005;25:3109-3116.
- Smith KD, et al. Tim-Tipin dysfunction creates an indispensible reliance on the ATR-Chk1 pathway for continued DNA synthesis. J Cell Biol. 2009;187:15-23.
- Lee J, et al. Claspin, a Chk1-regulatory protein, monitors DNA replication on chromatin independently of RPA, ATR, and Rad17. Mol Cell. 2003;11:329-340.
- Mailand N, et al. Destruction of Claspin by SCFbetaTrCP restrains Chk1 activation and facilitates recovery from genotoxic stress. Mol cell. 2006;23:307-318.