ISSN: 2229-371X
Tirtharaj Dash*1, Subhagata Chattopadhyay2 and Tanistha Nayak3
|
Corresponding Author: Tirtharaj Dash, E-mail: tirtharajnist446@gmail.com |
Related article at Pubmed, Scholar Google |
Visit for more related articles at Journal of Global Research in Computer Sciences
Authorizing hand-written signature has always been a challenge to prevent illegal transactions, especially when the forged and the original signatures are very „similar-looking? in nature. In this paper, we aim to automate forged signature verification process, offline, using Adaptive Resonance Theory type-2 (ART-2), which has been implemented in „C? language using both sequential and parallel programming. The said network has been trained with the original signature and tested with twelve very similar-looking but forged signatures. The mismatch threshold is set as 5%; however, it is set flexible as per the requirement from case-to-case. In order to obtain the desired result, the vigilance parameter (ρ) and the cluster size (m) has been tuned by carefully conducted parametric studies. The accuracy of the ART-2 net has been computed as almost 100% with ρ = 0.97 and m = 20.
Keywords |
handwritten signature; automatic verification; ART-2; forged signatures |
INTRODUCTION |
Neural networks have been widely used in pattern recognition, especially where the patterns are complex due to close resemblance of „originalâÃâ¬ÃŸ and „generatedâÃâ¬ÃŸ patterns [1-4]. An important property of a neural network classifier is that, it learns the exemplary patterns (as inputs) by updating its nodal connectorsâÃâ¬ÃŸ weights. The drawback of such type of learning is that, when new patterns are fed, the weights are updated and as a result, it loses the memory of older patterns and stores the impression of new patterns [5]. To handle this issue, Grossberg and Carpenter (1987) proposed the concept of Adaptive Resonance theory (ART) networks, where the networks retain the earlier learning, which is certainly advantageous over the conventional neural classifier [6]. |
ART is of two types i.e. type-1 and type-2. ART-1 takes binary input vector, whereas, ART-2 takes analog/continuous input vector and therefore more meritorious [7]. In our earlier work, ART-1 network has been considered for automatic verification of hand-written signature offline, with high level of accuracy (99.97%) [8]. In that paper, however, only two forged signatures were considered. In this paper, ART-2 has been considered for the offline verification of twelve very similar looking but forged handwritten signatures. |
Handwritten signature is the principal biometric measure for personal identification. It is an important method for performing legal transactions. However, there are chances when signatures could be delicately copied, such that these apparently resemble originals and are difficult to be identified by the naked eyes. Hence, automating such a detection process could be of real advantage to us. However, it requires vast research prior its practical use. In this view, this paper is an attempt where ART-2 net has been used and implemented using both sequential and parallel programming techniques to note its detection accuracy and speed. |
Automatic verification of handwritten signature is an age-old research topic. Available literatures show that several traditional and soft computing techniques have been used for accomplishing the said task. Due to space constraints, detail discussion of all the techniques are beyond the scope of this paper. Hence, some relevant studies have been shown, below. |
From these studies, it may be noted that ART has not been tested widely in this field, which leaves an opportunity to investigate ART-2, which is the motivation behind this work. |
In the following section, we have described the methodology of ART-2 implementation using „CâÃâ¬ÃŸ language using both the sequential and parallel programming. |
METHODOLOGY |
RESULTS |
The average similarity index (SI) between the original and forged signatures near 51%, which may have higher chance of matching, instead of rejecting the forged signatures. It is desired that even with slightest difference, the network must be able to differentiate those from the original signature based on its learning and assigned vigilance. The paper suggests that vigilance parameter (ρ) needs to be optimally set, which is the first challenge. In this work, optimum ρ has been set through a detail parametric study (see table-1 and 2). The second challenge is to assure that the network learns the exemplary patterns through several observations (number of clusters). |
Table 3 shows how the cluster size (m) influences the accuracy and the computational times. In table 1, it may be seen that with forged signatures 11 and 12 the mismatch is <5% and therefore these are accepted as original. In case, the mismatch threshold is set <1%, the algorithm would be able to detect all forged signatures. Hence, we have made the algorithm very flexible to allow such modification, which depends on the situations. Table 2 shows that with ρ=0.97, the detection accuracy is almost 100% with minimum time in both sequential and parallel programming. |
Fig.3 plots the „ρ vs. accuracyâÃâ¬ÃŸ parametric study. As seen in table 2, for ρ = 0.97, the accuracies are 99.9989 in both the sequential and parallel programming, we have shown the plot for parallel processing. |
Table-3 shows that with „ρ=0.97âÃâ¬ÃŸ and „mâÃâ¬ÃŸ = 20, the detection accuracy is the highest. Fig. 4 plots the number of clusters (m) vs. the respective accuracy levels achieved. |
Therefore, we conclude that through parametric studies, our method gives more accurate result when compared with other techniques, described in section I. |
CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK |
An ART-2 type net has been developed in this work for automating the verification of very similar looking (SI ~51%) forged signatures, offline. It has been implemented with both sequential and parallel processing to achieve faster and accurate detection with a mismatch threshold of 5%. Through parametric studies the best „ρâÃâ¬ÃŸ and „mâÃâ¬ÃŸ are obtained. The accuracy is found to be 99.98%. |
It is important to mention that, in this study we have tested only twelve forged signatures, which is a small sized sample. This is certainly a limitation of this work. The net needs to be tested with many different types of original as well as forged signatures for obtaining a more authentic proof of its performance. We are currently working on it. |
References |
|