Research & Reviews: Research Journal of Biology
MenuISSN: 2322-0066
ISSN: 2322-0066
Gayatri Shah1*, Shyam Narayan Labh2
1 Department of Zoology, Post Graduate Campus, Tribhuvan University, Biratnagar, Nepal
2 Department of Zoology, Amrit Campus, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal
Received: 11-May-2022, Manuscript No. JOB-22-63529; Editor assigned: 16-May-2022, PreQC No. JOB-22-63529 (PQ); Reviewed: 31- May -2022, QC No. JOB-22-63529; Revised: 08-Jun-2022, Manuscript No. JOB-22- 63529 (R); Published: 17-Jun-2022, DOI: 10.4172/2322- 0066.10.5.004.
Visit for more related articles at Research & Reviews: Research Journal of Biology
Feeding on all kinds of aquatic plants and animal makes, cat fishes expose them to more infective helminth larvae through their diet. This study was conducted to examine the prevalence of helminths parasites in the gastrointestinal tract of two species of catfishes, Clarias gariepinus (n=100) and Heteropneustes fossilis (n=180). Fish were examined after isolating the contents of the gastrointestinal tract and observed for the presence of helminths using microscope. Results show that out of 280 fishes, 264 (94.28%) fish were found to be infected with the helminths parasite. C. gariepinus infection rate was 84% with three species of parasites, one each of nematode. Procamallanus laevionchus, cestode, Proteocephalus species, and trematode, Allocreadium species. Heteropneustes fossilis have a prevalence rate of 100% with five species of five helminths. Procamallanus heteropneustes and Eustrongyloides species, Lytocestus indicus, Phyllodystomum folium and Pomphorhynchus species were detected.
Catfishes; Clarias; Gastrointestinal Helminth Parasites; Heteropneustes
Catfish belongs to the order Siluriformes which are found to be bottom dwellers with feeding habits of almost all kinds of aquatic plant and animals as a natural food playing a vital role in transferring energy [1]. Catfishes are cultivated widely because of their high market value and attractive benefits such as high growth rate, ease to cultivate as they consume artificial food easily, and have less chance of losses due to their high resistant power to different diseases and environmental change. Catfishes are also considered as one of the most common and affordable sources of animal proteins [2]. Due to the air-breathing nature of catfishes, they can survive in low aerated water bodies and at the commercial level and their production can be achieved without artificial aeration cost [3]. Clarias gariepinus, commonly known as African catfish, is found in all from of freshwater and their importance has been increased in aquaculture for its high growth rate and low production cost with a cheap source of animal protein in the human diet [4]. Heteropneustes fossilis is also known as stinging catfish. This fish is also has a high consumer demand due to its good taste as it has a fewer intramuscular spine with higher resistance to low oxygen content which makes it easy for cultivation [5].
With the increasing demand for catfishes, their culture has been intensified but the pisciculturists are having losses due to the diseases resulting from parasitic infections. Nowadays, the parasitic infection has been considered as one of the important factors for economic and production losses in the fish culture due to fish mortality, reduction in fish growth and fecundity as well as increasing the vulnerability of fish to other diseases [6]. Luque and Poulin have also stated that catfishes harbor a greater variety and occurrence of larval helminth parasites because they are exposed to more infective helminth larvae in their diet due to their predatory habit which makes them more susceptible to higher parasitic burden [7]. Besides these, several helminth parasites are being transmitted to humans through fishes [8].
Proper identification, prevention, and correct therapy for treatable infestations dramatically improve the health and productivity of affected fishes. However, only a few studies have been carried out on helminth parasites of freshwater fishes of Nepal and to my knowledge, no studies have been conducted on the burden of gastrointestinal helminth parasites of catfishes found in Nepal. Therefore, this study was designed to detect the occurrence and burden of helminth parasites present in the gastrointestinal tract of two catfishes i.e. Clarias gariepinus and Heteroponeustes fossilis found in the eastern region of Nepal.
Study design and setting
This study was carried out in the Department of Zoology, Post Graduate Campus, Tribhuvan University, Biratnagar, Nepal over a period of six months (May 2017 to October 2017). Biratnagar is the capital city in Eastern Nepal having geographical location 26°28'60"N 87°16'60"E . It lies 399 km east of Nepal’s capital, Kathmandu and 6 km north of the border of the Indian state, Bihar.
Collection of fish samples
The catfishes, Clarias gariepinus and Heteropneustes fossilis, were collected from different freshwater ponds and rivers near the Biratnagar area. Catfishes were also randomly collected from the local fish market of Biratnagar. Mostly the live fishes were collected from surrounding rivers and ponds with the help of local fishermen. The fishes were washed properly in clean water and then transported in a clean plastic bag to the Zoology Laboratory of Post Graduate Campus, Biratnagar for further study.
Examination for gastrointestinal helminth parasites
Small fishes were killed by pitching and larger specimens by hitting on the cranium. The killed fish were dissected and the gastrointestinal tract was separated from the visceral mass of the body and kept in the Petri dish. The food tract was cut into pieces of 1cm each for observation of helminths. The cut parts were placed in Petri dishes containing saline water. Each piece of the intestine was further carefully slit opened for the emergence of any adult parasites. The gut content was further observed under microscope by simple wet mount and iodine mount preparation. For this, about one gram of gut content and a drop of normal saline or iodine solution was placed on a clean, dry glass slide and mixed to make a smear and a coverslip was kept, and the preparation was then observed under the light microscope (first under 10X and then 40X magnification) for the search of various helminth parasites. The remaining gut content was preserved in formalin in vials. The external and internal morphological characters of each worm were recorded and identified by using standard keys [9-11].
Data processing and analysis
Data were analyzed using a Statistical Package for the Social Science (SPSS) version 16.0 and interpreted according to frequency distribution and percentage. Data were recorded regarding the prevalence of helminth parasites in two catfish. The prevalence of helminth parasites was calculated according to [12], where, prevalence (p)=the number of the infected host with one or more individuals of a particular parasite species divided by the number of hosts examined (expressed in percentage).
In this study, a total of 280 catfishes were examined for gastrointestinal helminth parasites which included Clarias gariepinus (n=100) and Heteroponeustes fossilis (n=180). Among the two species of catfish examined for their gastrointestinal helminth parasites, Clarias gariepinus was found to be infected by nematodes, cestodes, and trematodes while Heteroponeustes fossilis was infected by all four groups of helminth parasites (Table 1).
| Group of helminth parasites | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fish species | Nematode | Cestode | Trematode | Acanthocephalan |
| Clarias gariepinus | + | + | + | - |
| Heteroponeustes fossilis | + | + | + | + |
*Note. + ( present); - (absent)
Table 1. Infection of catfish with gastro-intestinal helminth parasites).
Among 100 Clarias gariepinus examined, 84 of them were found to be infected with some helminth parasites having a prevalence of 84.0%. Three parasites, one each of nematode, Procamallanus laevionchus, cestode, Proteocephalus species, and trematode, Allocreadium species, were detected from the gut content of Clarias gariepinus with the highest number of fish infected with Procamallanus laevionchus (46.0%). Similarly, all of the Heteroponeustes fossilis (180 out of 180) were found to contain some helminth parasites in their gastrointestinal tract having a prevalence of 100%. Five parasites were detected from the gut content of Heteroponeustes fossilis.
Two nematode species namely Procamallanus heteropneustes and Eustrongyloides species, one cestode namely Lytocestus indicus, one trematode, Phyllodystomum folium, and an acanthocephalan, Pomphorhynchus species were detected (Table 2).
| Fish species | Number of fish examined | Prevalence of infection | Parasites | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Species | Number (%) | |||
| Clarias gariepinus | Procamallanus laevionchus | 46 (46.0) | ||
| 100 | 84.00% | Proteocephalus species | 21 (21.0) | |
| Allocreadium species | 17 (17.0) | |||
| Heteroponeustes fossilis | Procamallanus heteropneustes | 68 (37.8) | ||
| 180 | 100% | Eustrongyloides species | 54 (30.0) | |
| Lytocestus indicus | 39 (21.7) | |||
| Phyllodystomum folium | 43 (23.9) | |||
| Pomphorhynchus species | 180 (100) | |||
Table 2. Distribution of helminth parasites in the gastrointestinal tract of catfish.
Multiple infections of catfishes with helminth parasites were common observations in this study. Among 100 Clarius gariepinus examined, Procamallanus laevionchus and Proteocephalus species were concurrently detected from 15.0% Clarius gariepinus. Multiple infections by the helminth parasites were also common in Heteroponeustes fossilis. Among 180 fish examined, 37.8% were infected by both Pomphorhynchus species and Procamallanus heteropneustes and 8.3% were infected by both Pomphorhynchus species and Eustrongyloides species. Similarly, Phyllodystomum folium and Pomphorhynchus species were concurrently detected from 23.9% of fish. From a few Heteroponeustes fossilis, three helminth parasites, Lytocestus indicus, Pomphorhynchus species, and Eustrongyloides species were concurrently detected (Table 3).
| Parasites observed | Number of fishes with multiple infections | Number of multiple infections | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pomphorhynchus species | Eustrongyloides species | ||
| Procamallanus heteropneustes | 68 (37.8%) | - | |
| Eustrongyloides species | 15 (8.3%) | - | |
| Phyllodystomum folium | 43 (23.9%) | - | |
| Lytocestus indicus | 39 (21.7%) | 165 (91.7%) | |
Table 3. Multiple infections of Heteroponeustes fossilis with helminth parasites.
Parasitic diseases of fish result in great economic loss due to the effect on normal health conditions of fishes, reduction of growth, abnormal metabolic activities, and even death. The factors that directly influence the parasitic fauna of fishes are age, diet, an abundance of fishes, independent number of a parasite within fish and season. The characteristic of any water body can influence and determine its parasitic fauna and when environmental conditions become suitable for mass reproduction of parasites, the parasitic diseases may spread very quickly [13]. Thus, proper identification of fish parasites, their prevention, and correct therapy for treatable infestations dramatically improve the health and productivity of affected fish. In the present study, two species of catfish found in the Biratnagar area of Nepal were examined for occurrence and burden of gastrointestinal helminth parasites.
Among 100 Clarias gariepinus examined, 84.0% were found to be infected with helminth parasites. Three parasites were detected from the gut content of this fish i.e. one nematode species, one cestode, and one digenean trematode. This result conforms to some other studies [14]. Dan-kishiya & Zakari reported nematode, cestode, and trematode in wild Clarias gariepinus in Gwagwalada, Nigeria. Aliyu and Solomon and Salawu also detected some nematodes, cestodes, and trematodes from Clarias gariepinus [15,16]. The difference in the prevalence of parasites in fish may be due to many factors. Williams and Jones suggested that parasitism is determined by the interaction between both biotic and abiotic factors and differs in various aquatic ecosystems. Reports have shown that helminths are generally found in all freshwater fishes, with their prevalence and intensity-dependent on factors of parasite species, host and its feeding habits, hygiene of the water body, and presence of intermediate hosts for the parasites [17-19].
In the current study, nematode species, Procamallanus laevionchus was detected from 46.0% Clarias gariepinus and have a higher burden than cestode namely Proteocephalus species (21.0%) and digenean trematode, Allocreadium species (17.0%). The higher incidence of nematodes than cestodes and trematodes revealed that nematodes were the commonest cause of parasitic infection in Clarias gariepinus and this is in conformity with the findings also detected Allocreadium species from 3.6% and Procamallanus laevionchus from 32.5% of Clarias gariepinus [20]. Barson and Avenant-Oldewage reported Proteocephalus species from 14% of Clarias gariepinus. Multiple infections by the helminth parasites were commonly seen in Clarias gariepinus. Among total Clarias gariepinus, Procamallanus laevionchus, and Proteocephalus species were concurrently detected from 15.0% of fish [21]. Ajala & Awole also reported multiple infections of helminth parasites in the gastrointestinal tract of Clarias gariepinus.
The catfish culture in Nepal is of great significance because of its highly nourishing and easy source of protein. Parasites attack the fish and destroy them and/or produce disease in their bodies, thus making them unedible.
The stinging catfish, Heteroponeustes fossilis was also examined and all of them were found to contain some helminth parasites in their gastrointestinal tract with the prevalence of 100%. Five parasites were detected from the gut content of this fish. Two nematode species namely Procamallanus heteropneustes and Eustrongyloides specieswere detected from 37.8% and 30.0% fishes respectively. One cestode namely Lytocestus indicus (21.7%), one trematode, Phyllodystomum folium (23.9%), and an Acanthocephalan Pomphorhynchus species(100%) were detected from the Heteroponeustes fossilis. Other studies from different countries also reported variable prevalence of different parasites from the gastrointestinal tract of Heteroponeustes fossilis. Yadav also detected Pomphorhynchus speciesfrom the gastrointestinal tract of 100% of Heteroponeustes fossilis, which is similar to the result of the current study, the prevalence of Eustrongyloides larvae was 50% in this fish. Similarly, identified cestode parasites from the intestine of 50% of Heteroponeustes fossilis and Gupta reported Procamallanus heteropneustes from 31.3% and Lytocestus indicus from 5.7% of Heteroponeustes fossilis [22,23].
Discussed that the species and feeding activity of the fish host and the preference and composition of the food play an important role in the diversity of the helminth parasites in the gastrointestinal region of fishes. Hence, further investigation of the gastrointestinal helminth parasite is very much necessary to explore more information regarding fish parasites as well as the parasitic diseases of fish in the entire country.
The present findings confirm that helminth parasites are widespread in the gastrointestinal tract of catfish found in the Biratnagar area of Nepal and the prevalence of helminth parasites is higher with the heavy parasitic burden. The presence of helminth parasites in fish of the reservoir may be the result of poor water quality, crowding, and other problems that give suitable habitats for those parasites and intermediate hosts. The possibility of multiple and concurrent infections of different species of parasites in a fish was established and may pose a health risk of zoonotic transmission to consumers. Since it has been stated that helminth parasitic infection of fish affects its productivity, marketability, palatability, and death of a good number of fishes, it is necessary to detect the parasites and develop their effective control measures.
The authors are thankful to Prof. Bharat Raj Subba, Mr. Shiva Narayan Yadav, Jay Narayan Shrestha and all the faculties of the Department of Zoology, Post Graduate Campus, Tribhuvan University, Biratnagar, Nepal.
None declared
No any funding was received to conduct this study.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [EBSCO]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [EBSCO]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [EBSCO]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [EBSCO]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [EBSCO]
[Google Scholar] [EBSCO]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [EBSCO]