e-ISSN: 2319-9849
1Department of Chemistry, Deogiri College, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India
2Department of Chemical Technology, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India
3Shivaji University, Vidyanagar, Kolhapur, Maharashtra, India
4Department of Chemistry, Vinayakrao Patil College, Vaijapur, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India
Received date: 30/04/2016; Accepted date: 09/06/2016; Published date: 13/06/2016
Visit for more related articles at Research & Reviews: Journal of Chemistry
A one-pot efficient, green and environmentally friendly multicomponent synthesis of novel 5-amino-7-(substituted phenyl)-2-thioxo- 3,7-dihydro-2H-pyrano[2,3-d]thiazole-6-carbonitrile derivative in the presence of green, low cost, mild, efficient and commercially available potassium carbonate as the catalyst with water. This method has the advantages of high yield, simple, clean reaction, short reaction time and no use of hazardous organic solvents.
2-thioxothiazolidin-4-one, 2H-pyranes, Malononitrile, Water, Multicomponent reaction.
The multicomponent synthesis have emerged as an efficient, powerful tool in modern organic chemistry for generation of highly diverse, complex product, high atom economy, high purity and better product yield. They are widely used in organic synthesis and medicinal chemistry because they are one-pot processes for assembling three or more component [1,2]. The 4H-pyrane nucleus is biologically important molecules possessing a wide spectrum of biological and pharmacological activities, such as antibacterial [3-5], antiviral [6,7], mutagenicity [8], antiproliferative [9], sex pheromone [10], antitumor [11,12], cancer therapy [12-14] and central nervous system activity [15]. Some of these compounds could also be used as inhibitors [15,16]. Some of 4H-pyranes refluxing for many hours in organic solvents, complex steps, which display strong biological activity including antibacterial, anticancer, and inhibitory are shown in Figure 1.
The conventional synthesis in previous work several methods have been reported for the preparation of tetrahydrobenzo[b] pyrans or dihydropyrano[c]chromenes, for example the microwave [17], ultrasonic irradiation [18]. In addition, there are several modified procedures using a variety of reagents, including the use of hexadecyldimethylbenzyl ammonium bromide (HDMBAB) [19], tetrabutylammonium bromide (TBAB) [20], fluoride ion [21], ionic liquids [22-24], rare earth perfluorooctanoate [RE(PFO)3] [25], Na2SeO4 [26], high surface area MgO [27], nanosized MgO [28], solid acid [29,30], diammonium hydrogen phosphate [31,32], silica bonded n-propyl- 4-aza-1-azoniabicyclo[2.2.2]octane chloride [33], DBU [34] and ZnFe2O4 [35] as catalysts in a one-pot reaction.
However aforementioned methods suffer from the drawbacks such as low yields, long reaction times, expensive, unavailability, toxicity of the reagent, toxic solvents, tedious work-up procedures, additionally the main drawback of almost existing methods is that the catalysts are decomposed under aqueous work-up conditions and their recoveries are often impossible. Therefore, to overcome these drawbacks a great deal of efforts is directed to develop an efficient, catalytic system for synthesis of these compounds.
Many of these procedures have merit, however, most require use of expensive catalysts and tedious work-up. We decided to investigate potassium carbonate for use as an organic catalyst for the synthesis of 5-amino-7-(substituted phenyl)-2-thioxo-3,7- dihydro-2H-pyrano[2,3-d]thiazole-6-carbonitrile in aqueous medium.
In continuation of our work [36-42], we have developed the new protocol for the synthesis of pyrano derivatives. The potassium carbonate has eco-friendly nature, high reactivity, easy handling and easy work-up. It is a novel organic catalyst in the one-pot synthesis of a library of heterocyclic compounds. We have reported that potassium carbonate is an efficient catalyst in the reaction of aromatic aldehydes with malononitrile and 2-thioxothiazolidin-4-one in aqueous medium at 90°C.
Experimental section
All chemicals, unless otherwise specified, were purchased from commercial sources and were used without further purification. The major chemicals were purchased from Sigma Aldrich and Avra labs. The development of reactions was monitored by thin layer chromatography (TLC) analysis on Merck pre-coated silica gel 60 F254 aluminum sheets, visualized by UV light. IR spectra were recorded on a FT-IR (Bruker). Melting points were recorded on SRS Optimelt, melting point apparatus and are uncorrected. The 1H NMR spectra were recorded on a 400 MHz Varian NMR spectrometer. The 13C were recorded on a 100 MHz Varian NMR spectrometer. The chemical shifts are reported as NMR spectra δppm units. The following abbreviations are used; singlet (s), doublet (d), triplet (t), quartet (q), multiplet (m) and broad (br). Mass spectra were taken with Micromass-QUATTRO-II of WATER mass spectrometer.
General procedure for the synthesis of compound (4a): In a 50 ml round bottom flask, the compounds 4-chlorobenzaldehyde (1a) (1 mmol), malononitrile (2) (1 mmol), 2-thioxothiazolidin-4-one (3) (1 mmol), catalyst (1 mmol) and solvent 1 mL, were added to the reaction mixture. The mixture was stirred under reflux condition for 2-15 h. The progress of the reaction was monitored by TLC (20% methanol: chloroform). After completion of the reaction, the reaction mixture was poured into the ice-cold water. The precipitate was filtered off and washed with water (3 × 10 ml), dried, and purified by recrystallization in ethanol as solvent to give 40-98% yield.
General procedure for the synthesis of 5-amino-7-(substituted phenyl)-2-thioxo-3,7-dihydro-2H-pyrano[2,3-d]thiazole-6- carbonitrile (4a-l): In a 50 ml round bottom flask, the compounds substituted benzaldehyde (1a-l) (1 mmol), malononitrile (2) (1 mmol), 2-thioxothiazolidin-4-one (3) (1 mmol), potassium carbonate (1 mmol) and water 1 mL, were added to the reaction mixture. The mixture was stirred under reflux condition for 2-4 h. The progress of the reaction was monitored by TLC (20% methanol: chloroform). After completion of the reaction, the reaction mixture was poured into the ice-cold water. The precipitate was filtered off and washed with water (3 × 10 ml), dried, and purified by recrystallization in ethanol as solvent to give 92-98% yield.
5-amino-7-(4-chlorophenyl)-2-thioxo-3,7-dihydro-2H-pyrano[2,3-d]thiazole-6-carbonitrile (4a): Yellow solid, Yield: 98%, mp 230–232°C; ES-MS m/z (%): 320.85, IR νmax/cm–1: 3240 (NH2), 3213 (NH), 3020 (CH–Ar), 2250 (CN), 1603 (C=C), 1034 (C-S), 982 (C–N), 757 (C–Cl); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 3.55 (s, 1H, CH), 6.40 (br, 1H, NH2), 7.21 (d, J=8 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.50 (d, J=8 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 8.62 (br, 2H, NH), 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ=39.5, 59.3, 71.2, 119.4, 128.4, 128.9, 130.1, 131.5, 147.6, 159.9, 188.2.
5-amino-7-phenyl-2-thioxo-3,7-dihydro-2H-pyrano[2,3-d]thiazole-6-carbonitrile (4b): Yellow solid, Yield: 94%, mp 195– 197ºC; ES-MS m/z (%): 287.81, IR νmax/cm–1: 3253 (NH2), 3210 (NH), 3010 (CH–Ar), 2248 (CN), 1579 (C=C), 1137 (C-S), 980 (C–N). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 3.25 (s, 1H, CH), 6.20 (br, 1H, NH2), 7.20-7.30 (m, 5H, Ar-H), 8.45 (br, 2H, NH), 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ=39.4, 59.7, 71.8, 119.3, 128.2, 128.7, 130.3, 131.2, 147.9, 159.2, 188.5.
5-amino-7-(2-chlorophenyl)-2-thioxo-3,7-dihydro-2H-pyrano[2,3-d]thiazole-6-carbonitrile (4c): Yellow solid, Yield: 92%, mp 180–182ºC; ES-MS m/z (%): 320.85, IR νmax/cm–1: 3240 (NH2), 3214 (NH), 3011 (CH–Ar), 2242 (CN), 1553 (C=C), 1234 (C-S), 766 (C–Cl). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 3.70 (s, 1H, CH), 6.50 (br, 1H, NH2), 7.22-7.25 (m, 3H, Ar-H), 7.60 (d, J=8 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 8.60 (br, 2H, NH), 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ=39.1, 59.2, 71.6, 119.7, 126.4, 127.4, 128.4, 128.9, 130.2, 131.5, 147.4, 159.3, 188.4.
5-amino-7-(4-methoxyphenyl)-2-thioxo-3,7-dihydro-2H-pyrano[2,3-d]thiazole-6-carbonitrile (4d): Yellow solid, Yield: 94%, mp 135–137ºC; ES-MS m/z (%): 317.39, IR νmax/cm–1: 3210 (NH2), 3150 (NH), 3011 (CH–Ar), 2232 (CN), 1546 (C=C), 1014 (C-S), 1076 (C–N).1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 3.60 (s, 1H, CH), 3.85 (s, 3H, OH), 6.40 (br, 1H, NH2), 6.90 (d, J=8 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.12 (d, J=8 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 8.50 (br, 2H, NH), 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ=39.3, 55.2, 59.2, 71.3, 119.2, 126.7, 127.7, 128.5, 130.3, 131.6, 147.7, 188.4.
5-amino-7-(4-fluorophenyl)-2-thioxo-3,7-dihydro-2H-pyrano[2,3-d]thiazole-6-carbonitrile (4e): Yellow solid, Yield: 92%, mp 198–200ºC; ES-MS m/z (%): 305.35, IR νmax/cm–1: 3233 (NH2), 3114 (NH), 3019 (CH–Ar), 2248 (CN), 1541 (C=C), 1017 (C-S), 1083 (C–N).1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 3.50 (s, 1H, CH), 6.30 (br, 1H, NH2), 7.20 (d, J=8 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.42 (d, J=8 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 8.35 (br, 2H, NH); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ=39.1, 59.2, 71.6, 119.7, 126.4, 127.4, 128.4, 130.2, 147.4, 159.3, 188.4.]
5-amino-7-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-2-thioxo-3,7-dihydro-2H-pyrano[2,3-d]thiazole-6-carbonitrile (4f): Yellow solid, Yield: 92%, mp 224–226ºC; ES-MS m/z (%): 303.02, IR νmax/cm–1: 3233 (NH2), 3119 (NH), 3039 (CH–Ar), 2237 (CN), 1544 (C=C), 1018 (C-S), 1089 (C–N).1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 3.80 (s, 1H, CH), 5.40 (s, 1H, OH), 6.15 (br, 1H, NH2), 6.90 (d, J=8 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.02 (d, J=8 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 8.45 (br, 1H, NH); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ=39.1, 59.4, 71.2, 119.3, 126.1, 127.2, 128.7, 130.4, 147.7, 159.1, 187.4.
5-amino-7-(4-nitrophenyl)-2-thioxo-3,7-dihydro-2H-pyrano[2,3-d]thiazole-6-carbonitrile (4g): Yellow solid, Yield: 94%, mp 182–184ºC; ES-MS m/z (%): 332.35, IR νmax/cm–1: 3238 (NH2), 3111 (NH), 3009 (CH–Ar), 2233 (CN), 1548 (C=C), 1017 (C-S), 1083 (C–N).1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 3.95 (s, 1H, CH), 6.10 (br, 1H, NH2), 7.30 (d, J=8 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 8.12 (d, J=8 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 8.62 (br, 2H, NH); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ=39.1, 59.9, 71.6, 119.2, 126.4, 128.4, 130.2, 144.4, 148.3, 159.2, 188.4.
5-amino-7-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-2-thioxo-3,7-dihydro-2H-pyrano[2,3-d]thiazole-6-carbonitrile (4h): Yellow solid, Yield: 92%, mp 245–247ºC; ES-MS m/z (%): 356.25, IR νmax/cm–1: 3253 (NH2), 3112 (NH), 3026 (CH–Ar), 2238 (CN), 1544 (C=C), 1012 (C-S), 1063 (C–N).1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 3.96 (s, 1H, CH), 6.13 (br, 1H, NH2), 7.11 (d, J=8 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.25 (d, J=8 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.56 (s, 1H, Ar-H), 8.60 (br, 1H, NH); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ=34.1, 59.2, 71.6, 119.7, 126.4, 130.4, 131.2, 132.2, 135.4, 141.4, 147.2, 159.3, 188.4.
5-amino-7-(3-fluorophenyl)-2-thioxo-3,7-dihydro-2H-pyrano[2,3-d]thiazole-6-carbonitrile (4i): Yellow solid, Yield: 96%, mp 251–253ºC; ES-MS m/z (%): 305.35, IR νmax/cm–1: 3201 (NH2), 3125 (NH), 3028 (CH–Ar), 2242 (CN), 1548 (C=C), 1019 (C-S), 1063 (C–N).1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 3.80 (s, 1H, CH), 6.12 (br, 1H, NH2), 6.22 (s, 1H, Ar-H), 7.10-7.15 (t, 3H, Ar-H), 8.51 (br, 2H, NH); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ=34.1, 59.2, 71.6, 119.7, 122.4, 132.4, 134.2, 132.8, 135.1, 141.2, 148.2, 158.3, 187.4.
5-amino-7-(2,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-2-thioxo-3,7-dihydro-2H-pyrano[2,3-d]thiazole-6-carbonitrile (4j): Yellow solid, Yield: 94%, mp 171–172ºC; ES-MS m/z (%): 347.41, IR νmax/cm–1: 3231 (NH2), 3117 (NH), 3015 (CH–Ar), 2244 (CN), 1545 (C=C), 1016 (C-S), 1053 (C–N).1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 2.99 (s, 1H, CH), 3.06 (br, 1H, NH2), 3.85 (s, 6H, OCH3), 6.10 (s, 1H, Ar- H), 6.43 (d, J=8 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.02 (d, J=8 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 8.58(br, 2H, NH); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ=33.1, 55.3, 56.4, 59.2, 71.8, 100.2, 106.2, 119.7, 126.4, 127.4, 128.2, 130.8, 147.4, 159.1, 188.2.
5-amino-7-(2-fluorophenyl)-2-thioxo-3,7-dihydro-2H-pyrano[2,3-d]thiazole-6-carbonitrile (4k): Yellow solid, Yield: 96%, mp 175–177ºC; ES-MS m/z (%): 305.35, IR νmax/cm–1: 3203 (NH2), 3117 (NH), 3013 (CH–Ar), 2241 (CN), 1531 (C=C), 1117 (C-S), 1063 (C–N).1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 3.92 (s, 1H, CH), 6.14 (br, 1H, NH2), 7.10-7.22 (m, 4H, Ar-H), 8.55 (br, 2H, NH2); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ=39.2, 59.5, 72.6, 115.5, 119.1, 124.4, 127.4, 128.2, 130.6, 147.2, 158.3, 161.2, 188.2.
5-amino-2-thioxo-7-(p-tolyl)-3,7-dihydro-2H-pyrano[2,3-d]thiazole-6-carbonitrile (4l): Yellow solid, Yield: 96%, mp 160– 162ºC; ES-MS m/z (%): 301.39, IR νmax/cm–1: 3223 (NH2), 3115 (NH), 3016 (CH–Ar), 2249 (CN), 1521 (C=C), 1011 (C-S), 1081 (C–N).1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6), δ: 3.35 (s, 3H, CH3), 6.12 (br, 1H, NH2), 4.35 (s, 1H, CH), 7.11 (d, J=8 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.15 (d, J=8 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 8.45 (br, 2H, NH); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ=21.2, 39.3, 59.1, 71.6, 118.7, 126.4, 127.4, 128.3, 130.2, 147.4, 159.3, 188.2.
In our initial study, the evaluation of a series of 2H-pyrano derivatives (4a-l) was carried out from aromatic aldehydes with malononitrile and 2-thioxothiazolidin-4-one in various solvents and catalyst (Scheme 1). The condensation reaction conducted in various solvents such as N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), ethanol, toluene, acetic acid, methanol, water and catalyst such as potassium carbonate, ammonium acetate and piperidine gave the corresponding product in the range of 40-98% after 2-15 h (Table 1). The best result obtained using potassium carbonate with water to give a yield of 98% (Table 1).
Entry | Catalyst | Solvent | Time (h) | Yieldb (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
Potassium carbonate |
DMF |
5 |
60 |
2 |
Potassium carbonate |
Ethanol |
4 |
64 |
3 |
Potassium carbonate |
Toluene |
5 |
75 |
4 |
Potassium carbonate |
Acetic acid |
4 |
70 |
5 |
Potassium carbonate |
Methanol |
4 |
65 |
6 |
Potassium carbonate |
Water |
2 |
98 |
7 |
Ammonium acetate |
DMF |
10 |
48 |
8 |
Ammonium acetate |
Ethanol |
13 |
40 |
9 |
Ammonium acetate |
Toluene |
14 |
40 |
10 |
Ammonium acetate |
Acetic acid |
12 |
40 |
11 |
Ammonium acetate |
Methanol |
13 |
45 |
12 |
Ammonium acetate |
Water |
10 |
60 |
13 |
Piperidine |
DMF |
15 |
42 |
14 |
Piperidine |
Ethanol |
14 |
47 |
15 |
Piperidine |
Toluene |
12 |
48 |
16 |
Piperidine |
Acetic acid |
10 |
48 |
17 |
Piperidine |
Methanol |
11 |
44 |
18 |
Piperidine |
Water |
10 |
62 |
Table 1. Screening of catalyst, solvents, reaction time, and yield for the synthesis (4a)a.
Additionally, this condensation conducted in the presence of other solvents and catalyst gave corresponding product with slightly longer reaction time and lower yields (Table 1). The reaction with catalyst such as potassium carbonate gave good yield with all used solvents in the range of 60-98% (Table 1). The use of other catalyst such as ammonium acetate the result obtained with various solvents to give a yield of in the range of 40-60% after 10-14 h (Table 1). In this condensation conducted in the presence of solvents gave corresponding product with longer reaction time and lower yields (Table 1). The reaction with ammonium acetate and water as a solvent gave good yield of 60% after 10 h (Table 1). The used of other catalyst such as piperidine the result obtained with various solvents to give a yield of in the range of 42-62% after 10-15 h (Table 1). In this condensation conducted in the presence of used solvents gave corresponding product with longer reaction time and good yields (Table 1).
The reaction with piperidine and water as a solvent gave good yield of 60% after 10 h (Table 1). After preliminary experiments, it was found that a mixture of 2-thioxothiazolidin-4-one, 4-chlorobenzaldehyde and in malononitrile at reflux temperature in the presence of potassium carbonate with water afforded 5-amino-7-(4-chlorophenyl)-2-thioxo-3,7-dihydro-2H-pyrano[2,3-d]thiazole- 6-carbonitrile (Table 1) in excellent yield 98% after 2 h.
All the reactions were carried out in equimolar amounts of each compound in 1 mL of solvent. Among these reactions same amounts of the solvent, namely 1 mL of water turned out to be the best choice with yields of 98%, 60% and 62% (Table 1). We would like to mention here that water as a solvent with potassium carbonate as catalyst was the best choice with a yield of 98% and less time required for the completion of the reaction (Table 1). Thus we decided to carry out the reactions in water with potassium carbonate.
We synthesized the novel series of 5-amino-7-(substituted phenyl)-2-thioxo-3,7-dihydro-2H-pyrano[2,3-d]thiazole-6- carbonitrile 4a-l (Scheme 2; Table 2). However, this reaction provided cleaner reaction, short reaction time, and the products were only required to be washed with ice-cold water. The yields were good to excellent.
Entry | Substituted aldehydes | Product | Time | Yieldb (%) | M.P. (ºC) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 4-Chlorobenzaldehyde | 4a | 2 | 98 | 230-232 |
2 | Benzaldehyde | 4b | 3 | 94 | 195-197 |
3 | 2-Chlorobenzaldehyde | 4c | 2 | 92 | 180-182 |
4 | 4-Methoxybenzaldehyde | 4d | 4 | 94 | 135-137 |
5 | 4-Fluorobenzaldehyde | 4e | 4 | 92 | 198-200 |
6 | 4-Hydroxybenzaldehyde | 4f | 3 | 92 | 224-226 |
7 | 4-Nitrobenzaldehyde | 4g | 2 | 94 | 182-184 |
8 | 2,4-Dichlorobenzaldehyde | 4h | 2 | 92 | 245-247 |
9 | 3-Fluorobenzaldehyde | 4i | 4 | 96 | 251-253 |
10 | 2,4-Dimethoxybenzaldehyde | 4j | 4 | 94 | 171-173 |
11 | 2-Fluorobenzaldehyde | 4k | 2 | 96 | 175-177 |
12 | 4-Methylbenzaldehyde | 4l | 3 | 96 | 160-162 |
Table 2: Synthesis of 5-amino-7-(substituted phenyl)-2-thioxo-3,7-dihydro-2H-pyrano[2,3-d]thiazole-6-carbonitrile (4a-l)a.
As shown in Table 2, this method worked a wide variety of substrates. A series of substituted aldehydes possessing either electron–withdrawing group or donating group reacted with malononitrile and 2-thioxothiazolidin-4-one under the optimized conditions to give the corresponding products in higher yields 92-98% after 2-4 h (Table 2).
A plausible mechanism for the reaction of 5-amino-7-phenyl-2-thioxo-3,7-dihydro-2H-pyrano[2,3-d]thiazole-6-carbonitrile derivative is shown in Scheme 3. According to the mechanism compound I and compound II react to each other and formation of the compound III that is Knoevenagel product. The higher reactivity of the iminium ion compared to the carbonyl species facilitates Knoevenagel reaction between aryl aldehyde and malononitrile. In the presence of potassium carbonate the compound III react with the compound IV which was the enol form of the compound V, then formation of the cyclic product of VI and VII and finally got the target compound VIII.
We have developed a simple, highly efficient one pot three-component method for the synthesis of various 3,7-dihydro- 2H-pyrano[2,3-d]thiazole-6-carbonitrile derivatives by reaction of aromatic aldehydes, malononitrile and 2-thioxothiazolidin-4-one with water in the presence of potassium carbonate. This procedure has many attractive features, such as simple method, high product yield, easy work-up and purification. Furthermore potassium carbonate and water are inexpensive and non-volatile making the method environmentally friendly and economically acceptable.
The authors thankful to Head, Department of Chemical Technology, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, Aurangabad-431 004, Maharashtra, India for providing the laboratory facility. The authors are also thankful to the principal, Head, Department of Chemistry, Deogiri College, Station Road, Aurangabad-431 005, Maharashtra, India for providing the laboratory facility.