Research Article Open Access

Comparison of Four Rapid Diagnostic Kits of Immunochromatography for Detection of Influenza A and Influenza B Viruses

Abstract

Objective: The objective was to compare the performance of four commercial rapid influenza virus antigen detection test kits, namely QuickNavi-Flu (Denka Seiken, Tokyo, Japan), Alere BinaxNOW Influenza A&B assay (Alere Scarborough, Scarborough Inc., Scarborough, ME, USA), KaiBiLi Genesis Influenza A&B Antigen Test (Genesis, Hangzhou, China) and Actim Influenza A&B (Medix Biochemica, Kauniainen, Finland).

Methods: CAP proficiency testing specimens and ultrasonic lysates of normal human lung fibroblast cell (MRC-5 at 2.9 × 106/ mL) were taken as specimens. The supernatants of influenza A and influenza B were used as stock solutions, and, using saline, were diluted to 1:10 and then serially diluted to 1:100, 1:200, 1:400, 1:800, 1:1600, and 1:3200. The dilutions were tested respectively to evaluate the sensitivity of these kits. Respiratory syncytial virus, adenovirus, Para influenza virus type-2 and MRC-5 cell were taken as samples to evaluate the specificity of these kits. Influenza A (H1N1) at a dilution of 1:200, influenza A (H3N2) at a dilution of 1:100 and influenza B at a dilution at 1:100 were used to detect the reproducibility. Each sample was tested nine times in total.

Results: In this experiment, the four commercial kits showed the same detection limit for influenza A (H3N2) where all the kits could not give positive result for dilutions lower than 1:100. On the contrary, different detection limits were obtained for influenza A (H1N1) and influenza B. For influenza A (H1N1), positive results could be obtained using a dilution at 1:800 by Quick Navi Flu yet positive results could only be obtained at the dilution of 1:200 using the other three kits. All the results showed that timely detection gave better sensitivity than delayed detection except detection for Influenza A (H1N1) by the Alere BinaxNOW kit where dried specimens gave slightly higher sensitivity. The Actim kit showed positive result for Influenza B when detecting the ultrasonic lysates of MRC-5 cell, illustrating that false positive result may be obtained when detecting specimens which contain components related to MRC-5 cell using Actim kit. There was no non-specific cross-reactivity for the other three kits. In general, all these kits provided good reproducibility except that results of of Influenza A (H1N1) detection using the Alere BinaxNOW kit were inconsistent.

Conclusions: Various performances were found for the detection of influenza A and B viruses using four rapid immunochromatography diagnostic kits most commonly used in China.

Pornpicha Ying Zhao, Yao Wang, Min Zhong, Yingchun Xu and Anping Ni

To read the full article Download Full Article | Visit Full Article