Previous Page  4 / 26 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 4 / 26 Next Page
Page Background

Page 42

Volume 08

June 28-29, 2019 | Oslo, Norway

Joint Event

Journal of Medical and Health Sciences | ISSN : 2319-

Breast Pathology and Cancer, Gynecology and Obstetrics Pathology, Palliativecare and Gerontology 2019

Breast Pathology & Cancer

Palliativecare & Gerontology

Gynecology and Obstetrics Pathology

Morvarid Shirmohammadi et al., RRJMHS 2019, Volume 08

Margin positivity and revision rates post breast conservation

treatment (BCT): Two years study

Introduction:

Breast conserving surgery (BCS) remains standard protocol

for managing localized breast cancers (BC). There is no consensus on ‘optimal’

margin width. Association of Breast Surgery (ABS, 2015), deem 1 mm for invasive

cancers (IC) and intraductal carcinoma (DCIS) as adequate while 2018 guidelines

recommends tumour on ink as ‘positive’ margin for IC and DCIS. We reviewed

margin re-excision rate at our centre, a major London University hospital.

Objective:

The main objective of the present study is to assess margin revision rate

(including completion mastectomy), post BCS; and if our re-excision rate is in line

with national average.

Methods:

Two years data was collected of patients undergoing BCS between

2017 and 2018. Re-excisions for positive margins and subsequent completion

mastectomy, if any, were recorded. Tumour demographic including size and

number of positive margins was also noted. We used ABS 2015 as standard.

Results:

The results showed that among 303 women undergoing BCS for cancer,

59 (19.4%) underwent further surgery, 42/59 (71/1%) had IC and 17/59 (28.9%)

had DCIS. Fifty out of 59 (84.7%) patients underwent re-excision post BCS and

9/59 (15.3%) had completion mastectomy. In patients undergoing completion

mastectomy, average tumour size was 42.5 mm. For IC, a median of two margins

were positive, while DCIS, median positive rate was marginally higher at three. In

comparison with previous data from our centre (AoE; 2015), there appears to be

3.8% reduction (23.2 vs. 19.4) in the re-excision rate.

Conclusion:

Our revision rate is 19.4%; in line with national average (17.2%).

15.3% women had completion mastectomy. Risk of positive margin was higher

with DCIS than IC.

Biography

Morvarid Shirmohammadi has completed her MD from Iran. After years of contribution to

medicine, she pursued her interest in Fundamental Research and obtained her MSc in Cellular

Biology from University of Paris 5 in 2007. She has published her papers in creditable journals

and presented her research in international conferences. She is currently a Histopathology

Trainee at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust.

mori.shir@nhs.net

Morvarid Shirmohammadi

Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, UK

Co-Authors

Dimitri Hadjiminas

and

Rathi

Ramakrishnan

Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, UK