Previous Page  2 / 10 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 2 / 10 Next Page
Page Background

Volume 5, Issue 5

Res. Rev. J Mat. Sci. 2017

ISSN: 2321-6212

Advanced Materials 2017

September 07-08, 2017

Page 22

conference

series

.com

September 07-08, 2017 | Edinburgh, Scotland

Advanced materials & Processing

11

th

International Conference on

Haruo Sugi, Res. Rev. J Mat. Sci. 2017, 5:5

DOI: 10.4172/2321-6212-C1-004

Direct recording of myosin head power and recovery strokes in hydrated myosin filaments provides

evidence against the swinging lever arm mechanism in muscle contraction

M

uscle contraction results from relative sliding between actin and myosin filaments, which in turn is caused by cyclic

attachment and detachment between myosin head extending from myosin filaments and active sites on actin filaments.

A myosin head consists of catalytic (CAD), converter (COD), and lever arm (LD) domains, and connected to myosin filament

backbone via subfragment-2. Based on crystallographic and electron microscopic studies on static structures of myosin heads

and acto-myosin complex, it has been proposed that myosin head exerts power stroke by active rotation of CAD around CD,

coupled with ATP hydrolysis. This mechanism is called “swinging lever arm mechanism”, and now appears in every textbook

as a dogma explaining molecular mechanism of muscle contraction. Using the gas environmental chamber, in which hydrated

biomolecules can keep their function in the electron microscope, we succeeded in recording ATP-induced power and recovery

strokes of myosin heads, which are position-marked with two different antibodies, attaching to junctional peptide between 50k

and 20k segments of myosin heavy chain in CAD(antibody 1), and to reactive lysine residue in COD (antibody 2), respectively.

Although antibody 1 covers two main myosin-binding sites on actin to inhibit formation of actin-myosin linkages, it has no

effect on both Ca

2+

-activated muscle fiber contraction and in vitro actin-myosin sliding. On the other hand, antibody 2 shows

no effect on muscle fiber contraction, but completely inhibits in vitro actin-myosin sliding. These findings, together with our

success in recording power stroke of myosin heads position-marled with antibodies 1 and 2, constitute evidence against the

dogma (or textbook view) that (1) during muscle contraction, myosin heads do not pass through rigor configuration, and (2)

muscle contraction does not results from active rotation of CAD around COD.

Biography

Haruo Sugi graduated from postgraduate School in the University of Tokyo, Japan, with a PhD degree in 1962, and was appointed instructor in the Department of Physiol-

ogy in the University of Tokyo. From 1965 to 1967, he worked at Columbia University as a research associate, and at the National Institutes of Health as a visiting scientist.

He was a professor and Chairman in the Department of Physiology, Teikyo University Medical School, Japan, from 1973 to 2004, when he became an emeritus professor.

Sugi was also chairman of the muscle committion in the International Union of Physiological Sciences (IUPS) from 1998 to 2008.

sugi@kyf.biglobe.ne.jp

Haruo Sugi

Teikyo University Medical School, Japan

Figure 1:

ATP-induced myosin head recovery stroke in the

absence of actin filament. Open and filled circles (diameter,

20nm) show the position of gold particles, attached to myo-

sin heads with antibody 1) before and after ATP application,

respectively. (Inset) Enlarged view showing the position of

gold particle before (red) and after (blue) ATP application. (B)

Histogram showing amplitude distribution of ATP-induced my-

osin head recovery stroke.